User talk:Rodrigo Padula

Arquivo de discussões>>

Hi. I've seen you edit in this user talk page. I want to comunnicate with him since all their uploads are in a wrong category. Says "Lagoa", when that category is for an insect. Can you talk to him or help me to fix them? Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Ah, bien. Tienes alguna idea de la categoría que corresponde? --Ganímedes (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

GLAM project

I took a look at your pages on meta, Wikipedia, and Commons for your GLAM project with Museu da Imigração. Everything looks great! You might want to upload at least one file into your Commons category so the category doesn't get deleted.

Good luck with your project. - PKM (talk) 19:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

There has been much discussion about the use of institutional accunts for GLAM projects, and I am not sure where we are currently on that. You should probably ask your question on the cultural-partners mailing list. If you are not on that list, you can get more information here: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Mailing_lists

I've been away from active GLAM projects fir the last couple of years. - - PKM (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove

Please do not remove deletion boxes as you recently did [here]. That is not helpful to the process. If you have an opinion about a deletion, please feel free to voice it, but do not remove the standard notices. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: so the best option is to leave a nonsense vandalism/edit/request by an IP ? It was not a real deletion request or valid argument as you can read there Rodrigo Padula (talk) 19:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

The best would be to approach an admin (like myself) and ask for help. Alternatively leave a message at the Administrator's noticeboard. It is not a good idea to remove the notice boxes no matter how you personally feel about the situation as that action is reserved for administrators. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: Hummm, I guess undo function and vandalism combat were open to everyone. Can you provide me links with that information that you provided here ? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

The entire process is described at COM:DEL. And it's a policy, so there's also a template.

@Ellin Beltz: That proccess is the same when the delection requestion is a vandalism created by an IP ? Because it was not a serios deletion request/discussion, it was pure vandalism Rodrigo Padula (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you leave the tags even when it's a problem and report either to a friendly admin or Admin's noticeboard, as stated before. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests

---

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Rodrigo Padula, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Pictures removed by bot - what to do

Hi Rodrigo,

I saw that you said that a bot has removed Ciro's pictures. Well, the important thing is that the pictures are here on Commons. All you have to do is add them again to the articles. For example, that bot made this edit [1]. Nothing can be done in that case because the file has been deleted from Commons, but with Ciro's pictures you just have to copy and paste the names of the pictures again into the articles. I think that's better than using the "undo" option because I don't know if there's a limit to how many times you can "undo" edits in a short period of time. If you need any help please let me know. For example, you can show me some of the articles where this has happened, and I will put the pictures in the articles again, but I've been blocked from the English Wikipedia, so please show me articles from other Wikipedias. Boa noite! Dontreader (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

@Dontreader: How can I see where the files were used before the removal? There are any way to check the bot logs regarding an special user or list of files? Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought you or Ciro knew where the pictures were. I cannot think of a solution. I believe there is more than one bot that removes files (maybe one for the English Wikipedia, one for a different Wikipedia, etc.), and other file names might have been removed by random editors when the pictures disappeared. The pictures were tagged as "Missing permission" on 15 July (UTC), so they were probably deleted on 22 July (UTC). I don't know how soon the bots edit the affected pages, but of course we would have to look at bot edits from 22 July and later. I looked for two of Ciro's files in the history of the English Wikipedia bot here but they are not mentioned on that page. Please, do you know the name of the Portuguese Wikipedia bot that removes links to pictures? Dontreader (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ação Educativa.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ação Educativa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Praia de Camboinhas 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Praia de Camboinhas 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Arariboia 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Arariboia 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:MAC - Niteroi.jpg
• File:Praia de Camboinhas.jpg
• File:Quintino bocaiuva.jpg

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascavel - crotalus durissus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 13:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment

Hello! There are discussions about som technical issues regarding some of your nominations at QIC. It would be very good if you could take a look, leave a comment and help us sort out the problems. See:

• Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#May 17, 2017
• Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#File:Cuíca - Marmosa paraguayana.jpg
• Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#File:Perereca-macaco - Phyllomedusa rohdei.jpg

That section works on a time-scedule so this needs to be fixed rather quickly. All the best, --cart-Talk 08:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falsa coral - Siphlophis compressus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy, but QI for me. --C messier 15:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camaleão - Polychrus marmoratus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs much better categorization for the species, "Animals of Brazil" is far too wide. Look at some of the FPs of animals and you will see how it should be done. This goes for all the five photos. Also, looking at the size of the photos and the output from your camera it looks like these have been downsampled 50% to get them sharper, please upload the files in their original size. See info here. --W.carter 16:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 22:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Uploads

Hi, please make sure to fill in the source field of your uploads. You are flooding the Images without source maintenance category. Jcb (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Now you are apparently uploading with automated software, I have blocked your account for an hour to stop the bot. Please leave a message here if you read this and have turned of the bot, so that I can unblock you. I am monitoring this page. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

When the block expired, the uploads started again, so I blocked your account again, this time for 6 hours. Please be aware that I will not be around to unblock you for the full six hours. That's the consequence of doing automated edits without monitoring them. Jcb (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: Hello. I and Rodrigo agreed, privately, that when he finished the uploads, I would make all the necessary corrections (category, licensing, titles, etc). I even created a template to use. So, please, you could revoke this block? Érico (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Ok, done. Jcb (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: template problem fixed! Bot up and running! Rodrigo Padula (talk) 02:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Jcb (talk) 09:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

--WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize again for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Wikimedia survey (corrected link)

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you are not a native speaker of English, I apologize for writing in English. If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you!! --WMF Surveys (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2018/Rules

Hello there! Please check your mail and reply to a letter with a topic WLE international (rules). We need to finalize them before the contests starts. Thank you! --アンタナナ 18:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Rodrigo Padula,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil

Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!

O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!

De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲»22:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Rio from above meeting 09.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rio from above meeting 09.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Darwin ^Ahoy! 11:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Rio from above meeting 05.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rio from above meeting 05.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Darwin ^Ahoy! 00:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Magalu - novo logo.png

Copyright status: File:Magalu - novo logo.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Magalu - novo logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Magalu - novo logo.png

Copyright status: File:Magalu - novo logo.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Magalu - novo logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Magalu - novo logo.png

Copyright status: File:Magalu - novo logo.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Magalu - novo logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lu do Magal.webp

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lu do Magal.webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lu do Magal.webp]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Darwin ^Ahoy! 17:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Lu do Magal.webp

File:Lu do Magal.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: ® Magazine Luiza – Todos os direitos reservados Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Darwin ^Ahoy! 17:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Adicionei a marcação de direitos reservados, o uso do arquivo, assim como um logotipo é para uso meramente ilustrativo, fair use. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 17:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Darwin ^Ahoy! 12:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ixocactus (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg

File:Frederico Trajano Magazine Luiza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ixocactus (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Toyama logo.png

File:Toyama logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Darwin ^Ahoy! 19:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Macchi M-9 Aerobote de reconhecimento e bombardeio (26087942604).jpg

Copyright status: File:Macchi M-9 Aerobote de reconhecimento e bombardeio (26087942604).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Macchi M-9 Aerobote de reconhecimento e bombardeio (26087942604).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:GLAM MB Contratorpedeiro Rio Grande do Norte (43931430540).jpg

Copyright status: File:GLAM MB Contratorpedeiro Rio Grande do Norte (43931430540).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GLAM MB Contratorpedeiro Rio Grande do Norte (43931430540).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Toyama logo.png

File:Toyama logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Emu (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC)