User talk:Daniel Case

User talk:Daniel Case ... The First 10 Years

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western Arctic Vistors' Centre, Inuvik, NT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attlebury Schoolhouse, Stanford, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Pines, Pine Plains, NY 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:12, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Because your human ability to recognize documentary photography The Photographer (talk) 03:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Second Baptist Church of Dover, Dover Plains, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perspective correction request[edit]

Hi, Daniel.

I just visited Cohoes, NY this afternoon. I really love that beautiful city and would like to add a photo of its city hall. Would you consider editing this photo for inclusion as a thumbnail in voy:cohoes?

Either way, thank you very much for taking so many photos of Upstate New York!

By the way, I also visited Waterford, NY, and I think that even though it's less spectacular than Cohoes, it merits a Wikivoyage article, as it has a nice historic district, the canal is interesting (I saw a lock operated early this afternoon), and I visited a noteworthy vintage items store at the corner of 3rd and Broad and the nice coffee shop with all sorts of interesting maritime artifacts and memorabilia on the walls that's catty-corner from there. I probably won't start a voy:Waterford (New York) article tonight, but soon, and if you have things to add about that town, great. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southbound Metro-North Harlem Line train departing Dover Plains, NY, station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It seems to me that the images is slightly leaning in. There are some dust spots, too. Perhaps a bit oversaturated... Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 16:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will get to it; hold on. Daniel Case 03:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment No problem, I've got time... as long as XRay won't interfere too early :-) --Basotxerri 17:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
? I'm interfering now. ;-) BTW: A declined and afterwards improved image can be nominated again. --XRay 04:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, that's for the next time. Thanks. --Basotxerri 15:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done OK, you can take another look. I also cropped it in a bit. Daniel Case 19:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Much better now, I prefer the new crop! --Basotxerri 20:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodine's Tavern, Montgomery, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent composition at all points. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tracks in MIlano Centrale Stazione trainshed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platforms at Milano Centrale Stazione central trainshed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New try[edit]

I was able to give my little juniper project a new try today following your advice. Found a part of the bush with better background and even cheated by using a tripod. Unfortunately the light is already waning and even though I shot it at approximately the same hour as the first, I'm not sure it is enough for any higher marks. These little buggers really need some quality light to look their best, tiny as they are (the smallest ones just about 1 mm). But I'll get them some day! :) cart-Talk 22:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View along terrace of Pyramid of the Sun, Teotihuacan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wide view of tourists at top of Pyramid of the Sun, Teotihuacan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Twin Otter beginning takeoff from airstrip near Margaret Lake, Ivvavik National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenn Borek Air Twin Otter taking off from airstrip in Ivavvik National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High-speed train at platform in Milano Stazione Centrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Looking up at Torre Pirelli from Piazza Duca d'Aosta, Milan.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 18:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mountain in Wadi Rum, Jordan.jpg[edit]

Just thought I'd say thanks for uploading this - I needed a photo of a red mountain for a Christmas present for my girlfriend, and this is just about perfect. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry[edit]

I over-reacted the other day at FPC. Sorry about that. We mostly agree on reviews, particularly your reviews "per Colin" :-). -- Colin (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image[edit]

Hi Daniel, would you mind if I cropped part of the skyline of this image? It's being used as a panorama on an article, and it would fit better if trimmed. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You know you spend too much time on Commons when...[edit]

... instead of cleaning up you see a photo op that is quite the opposite of the fridge pic. Since there are no good pics in this category, I'll nom it for QIC but I think I've filled my crazy-quota at FPC for this month with the plastic polar bear. cart-Talk 11:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock face overlooking Firth River at Muskeg Creek confluence, Ivavvik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are quite a few dust spots. Please fix them. -- Ikan Kekek 04:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done Daniel Case 05:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You got some of them, but I still see a few. For example, there's a small one above a notch in the rocks some ways down from the upper left corner, I've counted 4 in the cloud near the upper right corner, and there's one just above the left side of the tors. I think there are others, but they're very light, so it's not that easy to find them. I'm promoting this, but try to find the others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks ... I tried to get that last bunch. Daniel Case 07:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm still seeing a 2 or 3 small ones, but I'll leave you to your own devices with your hunt. 1 clear one is above an area of evergreens to the left of and higher than the tors. -- Ikan Kekek 09:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Confluence of Firth River and Muskeg Creek, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well composed and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There is a dust spot near the right margin some ways below the top and at least 2 or 3 in the upper left corner. -- Ikan Kekek 04:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
DoneOK, I got them, plus a few more I noticed while I was at it. Daniel Case 08:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's a little like Whack-a-Mole: I see 3 above the tors, each not quite in a straight line above the other(s). -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock crags atop cliff across from Muskeg Creek confluence with Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lots of dust spots on this one, too. I think your lens needs cleaning. -- Ikan Kekek 04:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done OK, take a look at it now. Daniel Case 08:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are still 3 big spots near the top margin in the center/right, plus some smaller ones to the right and left, close to being in a line with each other. Ping me when you clean those, and I'll promote the file. -- Ikan Kekek 08:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: OK, hope I got them ... Daniel Case 19:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Much better. You may have gotten them all. -- Ikan Kekek 21:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Front view of Milan Stazione Centrale entrance portico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View down Via Vittor Pisani from Piazza Duca d'Aosta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram along south side of Piazza Duca d'Aosta, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram in Piazza Duca d'Aosta, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esopus, NY, town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Reservoirs of the New York City water supply system[edit]

So are all of the NYC reservoirs within NY state? I hadn't known that. - Jmabel ! talk 19:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the answer (on my talk page). For what it's worth, at least with me, you can always feel free to answer the question where I asked it; if in doubt you can always get someone's attention w/ {{Ping}} on the spot or {{Tb}} on their talk page. - Jmabel ! talk 00:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Better?[edit]

I have added a caution-text to all of the railway pics. Example. It this ok/better/enough/in need of copy editing? cart-Talk 22:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jee's advise[edit]

I propose that, with your permission we archive related convo to rights, neither of us are admins and I have reached to to more then one. I can place it on the talk and it does not effect the voting...If you, (as you said) like it, please vote for it and lets see if it does get tagged, lets just strike the convo as unrelated to nomination and that is the end of it, were not setting new law and or going to become some kind of publishing trend setter by discontinuing a process older then both of us.. Thanks: --Don (talk) 03:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crooked Creek landscape, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some holiday joy[edit]

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! --cart-Talk 14:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)[edit]

		*** * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * ***
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy new year![edit]

	Merry Christmas, Daniel Case!
	English: Hellow Daniel Case, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply] --The Photographer 02:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New Pear![edit]

--cart-Talk 13:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shared electric cars at Piazza Duca d'Aosta, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers on tundra in Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper front facade of Milano Stazione Centrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Vittor Pisani, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments o.k. now for me. --Ermell 08:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good evening.[edit]

Also in the picture? Sincerely,
Agnes.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
PS; I've seen your picture. It is OK! Maybe a little grim.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campsite along Firth River at Joe Creek confluence, seen from above.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View across Firth valley in Ivvavik National Park with hikers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers overlooking confluence of Firth River and Joe Creek, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The group does not look very cheerful, but they look good on the picture in a beautiful landscape.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moved[edit]

Hi Daniel, I had no idea you were planning to upload the processing I made of your photo. I thought you only wanted my opinion on how it could have looked if I fixed it. Anyway, I moved it to a more neutral name since an editor's name don't belong in the title, that should only be in the description of the file's page. In this case it could also be bewildering for the viewer since they might be looking for a cart in the photo when using the search box to find photos. --cart-Talk 09:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourists taking pictures from Pyramid of the Moon, Teotihuacan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, I'll do it here ...[edit]

@Colin: if you're all about encouraging Tsui and other quality photographers, how come you didn't !vote in support of his other image from that same event taken under similar circumstances like I did? Huh? Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Colin: Still waiting ... Daniel Case (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Colin: : Oppose per your wife: It's a shaver. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Colin: : Can't say my name yet? Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View through archways at Castello Sforzesco, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK now Ezarate 13:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikimedians atop a lesser pyramid at Teotihuacan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like the composition, the funny of the wikimaniacs but the faces is in shadows, I approved it by the first not the second --Ezarate 00:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View up Joe Creek above Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braiding and islands in Joe Creek, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River-Joe Creek confluence westerly view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramid of the Sun, Teotihuacan, from path to parking lot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Don't see anything wrong with it! Good quality. --PhilipTerryGraham 06:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North view in Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II from rotunda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FPC showing animal camouflage not wowing?[edit]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panthera uncia - Zoo Karlsruhe 02.jpg

Hi, I'd like to talk some more words with you about your opinion that animals blending into the background provides no wow for you personally on principle. I totally respect it, but I struggle to understand that in theory, for you, there would be no wow factor in any FPC showing animal camouflage, regardless of the novelty and interest such photographs can have (at least for me). I still would love to know from you whether you would oppose a FPC showing animals in their natural environment, perfectly obscured by camouflage alone. Let's say, the whole photo shows just desert with grass, but only on closer view you could find a dozen animals hidden in plain sight, not obscured by other objects. (I call this the "Where's Wally?" photo) Would you still oppose this? I can't and likely won't change your view on photography, but I wanted to give you imaginary examples of where I find your principle that lack of subject separation is automatically lack of wow for you too close-minded and seeming absurd considering the unique effect I think these photos can have on the viewer (and thus wowing), when seeing them in the FP gallery, wondering what is so special about a boring nature scene, but then fining the animals all well hidden from predators. Thanks in advance for your thoughts! – Lucas ^T 07:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lucasbosch: There was one nomination a while back where I thought this actually made the picture more interesting ... I shall have to find it, and I would rather do that later since it is very late here. Daniel Case (talk) 08:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I look forward to it. I understand that not all of these images are awesome, but you worded it in a way that made it sound definitive and that's what irked me – Lucas ^T 08:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Sherrill from Spruceton Road, West Kill, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments While looking at the thumbnail, I thought it was oversaturated but it isn't. Great colours! There a some dust spots in the sky, could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 16:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done Daniel Case 18:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK now! Thank you! --Basotxerri 19:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wassaic train station, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely composed with the train, the bike riders and the cars, and nice clouds. -- Ikan Kekek 02:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers looking out over Joe Creek, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape around Joe Creek near mouth, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joe Creek with spruce trees, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View up Joe Creek, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Who stole my comment? OK for QI. --A.Savin 13:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milan Duomo with tourists in Piazza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Comment The dust spots in the sky should be removed--Ermell 08:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ermell: Done Thanks for pointing them out ... really faint! Daniel Case 16:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joe Creek zoom shot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sad thing picture, but beautiful.--Famberhorst 06:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundra landscape with mountain, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Bodine's Bridge, Montgomery, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montgomery, NY, welcome sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walden, NY, welcome sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Ignoring the background as irrelevant. --Peulle 08:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heermance Farmhouse, Red Hook, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. By occasion, youmay want to remove the dust spot to the left above the chimney --A.Savin 03:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maybrook, NY, welcome sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW tire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NY 293 in West Point Military Reservation, Woodbury, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some of the scenery is a bit unfocused at full size, but so what? Everything is good to add up to what we see at full screen. -- Ikan Kekek 05:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufeis remnants along shore of Firth River near Joe Creek confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain avens along bank of Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:22, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourists looking at flying buttresses on roof of Milan Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. DoF could be better. May be it's a little bit oversaturated. --XRay 17:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cox Farmhouse, Rhinebeck, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edge of aufeis near Firth River above Joe Creek confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small aufeis by Firth River near Joe Creek, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufeis cone at Joe Creek-Firth River confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puddle from melted ice near edge of Firth River above Joe Creek confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained wooden clapboard siding.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poughkeepsie Savings Bank entrance with Bernie Sanders sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please straighten the verticals. --A.Savin 01:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done Daniel Case 04:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 16:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wide angle Milan skyline from Duomo roof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View west along Duomo roof, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Daniel, I'm wondering whether you consider this a possible FP. It's a unique view of spectacular architectural elements that it would probably be hard to photograph without people in the photo, but would you vote for a photo that looks like this if someone else nominated it? -- Ikan Kekek 05:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Full Milan skyline from Duomo roof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Detial could be better, but good enough for QI. --W.carter 06:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evening Palacio de Bellas Artes view from southwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg 07:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Front view of Palacio de Bellas Artes at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop a bit tight but good quality. --W.carter 08:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palaco de Bellas Artes, Mexico City, from across Eje Central Lazaro Cardenas in evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The building is sharp is nice and sharp enough and the cables are unavoidable, but the streetlamp on the right is really ruining the pic. Do do think you could clone that out and perhaps soften the posterized lights on the cars down right? --W.carter 08:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@W.carter: I'll try to get to that tonight. Daniel Case 20:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done I actually decided to get rid of the wires as well. Daniel Case 16:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nice! :) Good quality. --W.carter 19:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gallatin, NY, town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso and piazza, Milan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 05:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2017-03-07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It was nominated by Spurzem --The Photographer 12:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hudson River shore at Norrie State Park, Staatsburg, NY, on summer evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What on blue side, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain and tundra landscape in Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems that there are slight Ca are left on the horizon, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View up Firth River in mountain reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. At first it looked a bit heavy on the blue saturation, but since the river is totally fine, I guess the light really was this way with deep colors. --W.carter 09:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River bending in mountain reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Babila, Milan, from across piazza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Daniel Case,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hope all is well[edit]

I found this today on the web: http://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-most-hated-landmarks-in-the-world/ss-BBzWNIK?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp#image=16 it uses one of your photos (slide number 12) in the featured photos. Just a FYI: Cheers!--Don (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Buildings in[edit]

Hey Don,

While your work is altogether really stellar, I'm really not sure if so many entities should be placed in "Buildings in..." categories. For example, entities like the FDR complex and the CIA, both in Hyde Park, are inherently more than just a building or a collection of buildings, which is why people won't go to that section to look for things like what colleges and attractions are in the area. Maybe it should be in "Buildings in..." if it was also in another Hyde Park subcat, but otherwise it should definitely at least be in the Hyde Park cat. I think the same could go for notable/key structures like the town hall and post office/library, where people will think it would be in a much more prominent/relevant cat. $ɱ$ (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Haha, I really did not think it was worthy of the title, but it was nice to run across your photo, (smile) Thank you for the vote and cat help on Astor. That yacht just finished a 15 year sail around the world.. Have a great day, Cheers. --Don (talk) 15:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hall_of_Prayer_for_Good_Harvests[edit]

Dear Daniel Case, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hall_of_Prayer_for_Good_Harvests_interior_2014.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 11:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 11:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominated photo question[edit]

Hi, recently I've nominated one of my photos for Commons's featurd picture which is Bangladeshi Young Girl. In that nomination, you asked a question about the stand-in of that girl on active rail. Yes. She is standing on the active rail. Thank you.

Time[edit]

We have daylight savings time here in Sweden right now and my camera recognize that. So technically, the silage and tractors photo was taken an hour earlier (7:10 pm) if you go by astronomical time. So not that late. ;) Since I was up late last night, I snapped this photo for you from my window to show what "real" midnight looks like at the moment. If the weather is fine on summer solstice a week or so from now, I'll see if I can go out and take a proper midnight photo that day. --cart-Talk 09:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:W.carter I was in Trondheim, Norway in the summer once. The sun only set for about an hour and even then it wasn't totally below the horizon. It was eerie being up at 11pm and being in broad daylight. PumpkinSky talk 11:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PumpkinSky: It depends on what you are used to. For me it is eerie and strange to have dark nights when it's warm outside. Feels strange every time I travel south. :) Sorry for loitering on your talk page, Daniel. --cart-Talk 11:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@W.carter: You can loiter on my talk page all you want

. That picture is what 9:30 p.m. looks like around here at the moment (and yes, we're on daylight savings/summer time as well). We have only five hours of real, sun-more-than-18º-below-the-horizon night this time of year.

@PumpkinSky: I've been further north than Trondheim. That's 12:45 a.m. in Inuvik, the largest town in the Canadian Arctic (or, OK, just to the south of Inuvik). After that picture, we went whitewater rafting and camping under that continuous sun in Ivvavik National Park for two weeks. Based on that experience, you can get used to it (but if you're in a tent with translucent white walls best to use a sleep mask ... sometimes even this time of year if I'm sleeping in it's a good thing too), although it doesn't stop being cool. Daniel Case (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's quite interesting. I hear the mosquitos up there in the summer are really bad too. Trondheim is the furthest north I've been on land but I've been up past the northern tip of Norway on ships.PumpkinSky talk 15:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@PumpkinSky: You have heard correctly about the mosquitoes. I'm sure if they had a mosquito Olympics, the North American Arctic team would easily kick the Florida team's ass (or whatever the appropriate body part would be), and then based on what I've heard they would in turn find themselves being used to mop up the floor by the Siberian team. https://www.flickr.com/photos/133250546@N06/21261774219/in/pool-2881294@N22/ Here's a photo of me, from the nose up, under attack one "evening"].

Ironically, that was the last day of the trip where they were really a problem ... that had been a day with 80-degree temperatures (Yes! 200 miles above the Arctic Circle—I actually took my only swim (such as it was) in the Firth that day), and within a day or two, it got considerably cooler (more like late September in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic USA) and as such the mosquitoes slowly reduced their presence to the point that well before we reached the Beaufort Sea they were happily a memory.

While looking at that photo may make you start to involuntarily scratch, shake and swat randomly, I was actually not getting bitten much thanks to the 30% DEET repellent I was wearing, which is pretty much de rigeur if you are outside and away from any large human settlement (i.e., downtown Inuvik) in that part of the world at that time of year. The Tilley hat and sunglasses are also being worn partly for defensive purposes.

You don't have to go far north in the US to experience really late sunsets this time of year. I remember a few years ago being in South Bend, IN, about as far west as you can get in the Eastern Time Zone, during early July, and feeling a little anxious as the sun stayed above the horizon until almost 9 p.m., a half-hour later than it does around here at its latest (anxious because I thought we had strayed into Central Time without realizing it). Apparently at the solstice that city enjoys sunsets at 9:22 p.m.. And if you go farther north but still stay on Eastern Time, to Marquette, MI, you can at the solstice enjoy a 9:46 p.m. sunset and astronomical twilight that persists until after midnight (making it theoretically possible to duplicate cart's picture above).

International Falls, MN and Bellingham, WA don't have sunsets quite so late ... but they do have dark-gray nights where it only gets to astronomical twilight, so if you look north at midnight or so you can see that bluish glow on the horizon and maybe even some reflected sunlight or dusk on a cloud near it if the angle is right. That little strip south of the western Canadian border is about the only place in the continental US where you can experience this sort of not-quite-night. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Front view of Our Lady of Victory Church, Inuvik, NT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Front view of Our Lady of Victory Church, Inuvik, NT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Box and bar of Côte d'Or chocolate.jpg[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Box and bar of Côte d'Or chocolate.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alternative offer for File:Strassburg_Ansicht_mit_Bischofsburg_Loreto-Kapelle_und_Stadtpfarrkirche_27032017_7168.jpg[edit]

You declined my photo File:Strassburg_Ansicht_mit_Bischofsburg_Loreto-Kapelle_und_Stadtpfarrkirche_27032017_7168.jpg in the FPC due to the bothering crop at the bottom. I admit that it is not satisfying indeed.
My alternative offer to that FP candidate is this photo from the same camera position, but with a different crop: File:Strassburg Ansicht mit Bischofsburg Loreto-Kapelle und Stadtpfarrkirche 27032017 7164.jpg Please, have a look at it and tell me, if this one might fit better than the nominated. Regards -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Email notice[edit]

Hey Daniel - hope you're doing well! Wanted to give you a heads up that I've sent you an email. Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blue sky in Spain[edit]

Hi Daniel, that one is really good. I'd suggest to categorize all images from Spain there and decat the few that don't fulfill it :) Poc o² 07:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trichoglottis background[edit]

Hey there,

Thanks for your comment at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dark purple Trichoglottis (70213s)c.jpg. I went ahead and withdrew that nomination, but spent a little time trying to play with the background to try to make it less distracting. Originally nominated version, new version. Do you think it's worth renominating the new one, or still too distracting? Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good morning Daniel,[edit]

Thank you for your next comment: I sort of see what you were seeing, and I love the texture, but on the whole it just doesn't feel like an FP for me. Some of the closeups in the annotations might have a chance, though. Daniel Case (Overleg)
What close up did you have in mind for any FP? Thank you in advance for your reply. Sincerely, Dominicus Bergsma.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FPCBot issues[edit]

Thanks for your support at:

File:Rose Garden - NATO Vista Bridge 3 NBG LR.jpg, but any idea why this has been missed by two FPCbot runs? It qualifies for a FifthDay promotion. Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 00:36, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See comment I made at the Rose Garden nom. It may be the emoticon. 03:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for calling me Japanece (smiley goes here)[edit]

I would never think someone would call me "japanece".

Thanks. Sincerely, Kazakhstanian.

P.S. I think you should try to make a photo that could make a mascot-class recognizible symbol of Wikipedia!

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2018, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world[edit]

I truly wish you, your family, and your friends Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world. Have a great holiday season. PumpkinSky talk 20:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FPC sets[edit]

Hi Daniel. I do hope your holiday is going well.

If someone nominates a FPC set and it is unsuccessful, is it then allowed for them to nominate one of the set photos, of course the best one, individually? Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 19:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

		* Happy Holidays 2018, Daniel Case! *
		¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! --The Photographer 18:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Foliage[edit]

This is exactly what I hope to find whenever I wander out into a wooded area looking for interesting foliage in the fall. Very nice. I think I need to get upstate a bit more. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ely State Theater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Really good photo, a possible FP, IMO, but you didn't credit the photographer in your nomination. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 02:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cincinnati Union Terminal Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Xmas lights[edit]

Hey Daniel,

Checking in about what you foresee as a timeline for nominating the Christmas lights photos for deletion. I'd like to see it happen sooner rather than later, since as I said over at the fpc I'm not really psyched about the idea of a bunch of pictures in limbo, opposed at FPC because they might be nominated someday and there might be support for deleting. I can nominate one of my own as a test case, even. Based on all of the past threads I could find, and the handful of responses I solicited, my hunch is there will not be support for deletion, however (this was part of my decision to upload them to begin with). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 05:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wing of Villa Gina, Trezzo sull'Adda, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 04:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River, tributary and V-shaped valley, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain and brook draining into Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bike path at UNAM Ciudad Universitaria campus, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basketball court and Humanities Tower, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medical school building mural, UNAM Ciudad Universitaria campus, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A4 Adda bridge and Naviglio Martesana, Trezzo sull'Adda, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains near Sluice Rapids, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River landscape at Sluice Rapids, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful landscape, great composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sluice Rapids, Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like the composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned building near spillway on east bank of Adda at Crespi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Humanities Tower, UNAM, with tree and lava ramp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 02:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mills-Livingston Mansion, Staatsburgh State Historic Site, at sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New crop[edit]

@Daniel Case: Following your review, I've uploaded a new version of my paddy fields without the sheaf in front Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Blond_and_green_rice_fields.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upstream view of River Adda from Crespi-Trezzo footbridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --PumpkinSky 02:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There's a dust spot in the upper middle. -- Ikan Kekek 11:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Done Daniel Case 04:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! US 9 north of Red Hook, NY, nine years later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Comment Cable offset. See note. Can you please repair.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Anges Monkelbaan: Done Daniel Case 17:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK. Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundra and mountains near Wolf Creek confluence with Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River banks in mountain reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ashokan Reservoir and Burroughs Range.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rear facade of Alfonso Caro auditorium, UNAM campus, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santissimo Nome di Maria, Crespi d'Adda, from southwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crespi d'Adda church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry, Daniel, but the right side is full of dust spots and there's at least one to the left of the steeple, too. If you're not tilting your screen back and forth to check for those before nominating photos, I recommend it. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Done Actually, due to my height, I have the screen tilted back about 20-30º to begin with. So I bob up and down instead. Daniel Case 23:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I cleared my cache twice, and I still see a slew of light dust spots, I swear, especially to the right of the steeple. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Done They were very faint, but they were there. Thanks again. Daniel Case 03:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River above Wolf Creek confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please examine both of these Firth River pics carefully for small dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek 08:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
* Comment You can remove the dust particles.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Agnes Monkelbaan: I had gone over it and uploaded a cleaned version before making this nom. If you still see some, can you leave notes where they are? Daniel Case 04:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Very vague left above. For me it is okay.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There's no way I can mark the dust spots. They're small and pretty light, but you should be able to see some if you look at full size and angle your laptop. They're a bit more obvious, though still small and light, on the other Firth River photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Done I'll look at the other one too. (BTW, I work on a desktop ... harder to angle. Daniel Case 03:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houses in Crespi d'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FPC Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi[edit]

Hallo Daniel, I made a crop of the picture according the suggestions --Llez (talk) 06:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red houses in Crespi d'Adda, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gelateria Cristallo, Crespi d'Adda, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Veteran image[edit]

Thank you, Daniel Case. I followed your advice and add the {{consent|public}} on every page where the depicted faces can be identified. --Ввласенко 22:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Cliffs in lower Firth River canyon reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cincinnati Union Terminal Ceiling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cincinnati Union Terminal Ceiling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thompson Pond with trees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks very strong saturated, but anyways overall good quality. --Granada 07:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Closeup of fading paint on abandoned garage wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 17:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window and door on weathered garage wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 17:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundra landscape with pond reflecting spruce trees, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundra landscape with mountains and small pond, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Comment photo has multiple dust spots and is in my opinion a bit on the blue side.--Famberhorst 16:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Famberhorst: How is it now? Daniel Case 07:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You're good at it been vacuuming. Okay now for me.--Famberhorst 16:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red house on Via Marconi, Crespi d'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via Vittorio Emmanuelle-Via Garibaldi intersection, Crespi d'Adda, from northeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fowl cages at wet market in Shenzhen, China.jpg[edit]

File:Fowl cages at wet market in Shenzhen, China.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

United States of Russia (talk) 09:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View along facade of science building, UNAM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. May be a little bit oversharpened and please check the blue sky. I'm not sure, but may be there is a dust spot at the building. --XRay 20:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@XRay: Done Thank you! I not only cleaned up the dust spot and the CA that I noticed in the process (which also seems to have helped with the sharpening) but corrected the perspective some more. Daniel Case 05:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View north on Via Marconi, Crespi d'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now. --Berthold Werner 10:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tors behind Wolf Creek campsite on Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spruce trees, tors and caribou antlers at Wolf Creek campsite, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stegosaurus Ridge, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca at Cuidad Universitaria, Mexico City, from southeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pathway to Crespi d'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copse of trees on Las Islas, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Nikhil B 05:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adda and A4 bridge with whitewater from Crespi d'Adda footbridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sky seems a bit too dark for me but O.K. now. --Ermell 12:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People watching early phase of 2017 solar eclipse in Riverside Park, Rexburg, ID.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundra and mountain landscape near Firth River and Wolf Creek confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufeis on Wolf Creek above Firth River confluence, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River and mountains from Wolf Creek campsite, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magenta what now?[edit]

You reviewed my photo of a 550 Barchetta, and what exactly is "magenta posterization?" How do I find it? How do I avoid/rectify it? As for the background, it is blurry on purpose, since the car is the subject of the photo. Thanks! mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 22:27, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Haven't looked at the image yet, but a promotion to QI leads me to believe that you must have done some editing. Thanks!!! Best, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 01:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape with tors, clouds and spruce trees in Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lots of dust spots once again. -- Ikan Kekek 06:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, I went over it again. If you find more could you please note where? Daniel Case 16:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They're all over the place. There are a whole bunch of small ones on the left side and some in the upper middle. The ones I notice are in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: OK, I've finally uploaded another version. Daniel Case 20:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support - Sky is still blotchy in places, but you did a good job on the dust spots. I think I saw one or maybe two very small, light ones, but I can't find either one anymore. -- Ikan Kekek 07:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate with tower in Trezzo sull'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houses at NE corner of Via Giuseppe Carcasolla and Via Martesana, Trezzo sull'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It seems that the image needs a perspective correction, could you check that, please? I would remove the two spots (birds/insects), too. Basotxerri Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:13:16 GMT
@Basotxerri: Done ~~~~ Daniel Case Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:37:54 GMT
Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:36:24 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House on Via Giuseppe Carcasolla, Trezzo sull'Adda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some sensor dirt spots in the sky (too many to mark them all) Granada Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:25:40 GMT
@Granada: I cleaned up what I could see. Daniel Case 17:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rear car of train and platforms at Como Lago Nord station in morning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the deep shadow. It might be better to cut right. But for me the image is good enough.--Famberhorst 15:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train at Como Lago Nord station, looking north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo of Milan Duomo Roof[edit]

Dear Daniel,

Just want to inform you that I used your beautiful photo in my video/ vlog. You can watch in YouTube at GkJmdx6yrAo Thank you for sharing the photo.

Best Regards S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 09:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Metropole and Piazza Cavour, Como.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relief mural on administration building at Cuidad Universitaria, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UNAM administration building, Ciudad Universitaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UNAM main library building with base pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Natürlich die Autofahrer

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main UNAM library from southeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Relief mural on administration building, Ciudad Universtaria, Mexico City, from NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciudad Universitaria dedication plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:30, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View down pergola at Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 18:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hillside overlooking Lake Como near Brunate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The motif is well chosen. There is a bit posterization in the sky and I suggest to reduce saturation a bit.--Milseburg 17:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Milseburg: Done Daniel Case 03:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Sorry I meant to reduce the saturation in the whole image, especially blue. But this is the minor problem. The posterization in the sky is still there. Feel free to get other opinions. --Milseburg 16:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done OK, other opinions, make yourselves known. Daniel Case 03:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC) Support OK for QI now I guess myself.--Milseburg 15:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re round objects at FPC[edit]

First of all LOL!! When I lived in Visby, I was once asked (in the middle of town) by a couple of American tourists: "You're supposed to have this old wall here, where is it?" I could only reply: "It's called the Visby City Wall, walk in any direction until you bump into it. They thought I was joking and that I was only being rude to tourists! --Cart (talk) 18:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@W.carter: The first time I visited Berlin, in 1988, what was then West Berlin was, of course, enclosed by a wall. That first night I was determined to see it for myself. So I walked out of our hotel, along the Ku'damm, and then figured that whatever way I walked I'd hit it at some point.

And believe it or not I did ... no, this isn't a story where I spend all night walking in the wrong direction; I actually got there within an hour, although looking at the map I'm not sure if I did it on foot or via the U-bahn. Probably the latter, but whatever way I went I went up a disused block of Wilhelmstrasse, noticed that just ahead there was a point where a dark line slashed across the street and the street lights resumed some distance beyond it. I had, indeed, found the wall just by striking out toward it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your kind feedback about my picture.[edit]

NiaPol 18:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firth River landscape at Sheep Slot Rapids, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 10:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheep Slot Rapids, Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 10:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rafter rowing through Sheep Slot Rapids on Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rafter in Sheep Slot Rapids, Firth River, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman with children playing in fountain on Como lakefront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman leading children into fountain on Como lakefront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couple on the Como lakefront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman holding hands with little girl on the Como lakefront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheep Slot Rapids and mountain landscape, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bend in Firth River canyon reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality - looks like you forgot to mask the sharpening area, there's some amount of visible sharpening artefacts in the colors. --Granada 06:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. I tried to fix that. Also got rid of some more dust spots ... Daniel Case 03:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upstream view of Wallkill River with cairn and reflection, Walden, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful autumn mood. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rushing water in West Kill below Diamond Notch Falls, Spruceton, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and good quality, Tournasol7 04:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straw texture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View north along NJ Transit Main Line tracks from Rutherford station grade crossing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Longitudinal view of Speedway station canopy at night, Montgomery, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northernmost extent of forest in Firth River's canyon reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Como cityscape and lakefront from Monumento ai Caduti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:57, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca and Torre des Humanidades I from Las Islas, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats in marina at Como, looking down the lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. But please remove the dust spot at the right of the right sailboat. --XRay 17:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@XRay: I couldn't find it ... could you leave a note? Daniel Case 17:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Daniel Case: Yes, a added three notes for a lot of dust spots. Hopefully they are not from a cached image. --XRay 07:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Thanks for the notes! Daniel Case 05:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East end of Las Islas, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Contours of the buildings could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:18, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parocchia San Giorgio, Como, Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pratt Street skyline from Convention Center, Baltimore, MD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The perspective can be improved --Basile Morin 07:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There has not been a lack of trying here. Daniel Case 21:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's visible on the left the building is leaning. If you need help to fix this I can make a new upload with the correction --Basile Morin 01:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Basile Morin: By all means ... that was the part that kept giving me fits. Daniel Case 19:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done so you may choose your version now, I'll try to keep an eye there -- Basile Morin 07:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Basile Morin: We'll go with yours. Daniel Case 14:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers climbing Engigstciak, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
* Comment You need to hurry, otherwise you get no longer in the group.--Famberhorst 05:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Endcaps at a Wal-Mart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit soft but still overall ok --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 250 West Pratt Street in late afternoon sunlight from Convention Center balcony, Baltimore, MD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonno from Lake Como ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PiramidePlazaIndependenciaTandil.1.jpg[edit]

Hi Daniel, how are you? I applied some Denise to the pic, do you think that is enough. Regards!!!! Ezarateesteban 11:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!!! I just removed CAs Ezarateesteban 00:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adirondack Northway below Poke-O-Moonshine Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support similar problems like the other image, but not that strong and ok for QI to me --Carschten 13:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun Life Building from E corner of Peel and René Lévesque, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domes of Mary, Queen of the World, Montreal, from N corner of Peel and Blvd René Lévesque, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View south across tundra to Engigstciak and British Mountains, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunlit Engigstciak seen from Firth River banks, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arctic lousewort on Firth River banks in Slope Reach, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 04:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tundra landscape looking south toward British Mountains near Engigstciak, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 04:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers returning from Engigstciak across tundra, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City hall and church tower, Lezzeno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary, Queen of the World, and 1000 de la Gauchetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domes of Mary, Queen of the World, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View southwest along Boulevard René-Lévesque from between Drummon and de la Montagne, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective should be corrected and sharpness added. --Ermell 06:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done Daniel Case 03:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E-Commerce Building, Montreal, QC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Demoted FP[edit]

Sadly one of your FP nominations was demoted to 'not featured' due to a sock double vote. However, you are welcome to re-nominated if you like. The nom is: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpine House, Kew Gardens.jpg. --Cart (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1402 Boulevard René-Lévesque Ouest, Montreal, QC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good perspective, but composition unfortunately contains large shadowed parts.. --Michielverbeek 18:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View south down Strand Street, Cape Town, from St Georges Mall intersection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion's Head in morning light from Strand and Buitengracht streets, Cape Town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! July 21, 2018, Cape Town train fire from station parking lot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downtown Cape Town with smoke from July 21, 2018, train fire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun in Cape Sun Hotel front sign, Cape Town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
improve the description on the image, the subjects are the letters --Ezarate 19:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC
Done Daniel Case 03:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC))Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:57, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Devil's Peak, Table Mountain and Cape Town cityscape at dawn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sun rising over downtown Cape Town on winter morning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals on the radisson should be checked --Ermell 07:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Daniel Case 15:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape Town City Bowl and Table Mountain at dawn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Buildings seem to be slightly tilted to the right. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape Town dawn cityscape with Table Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View north along Boulevard René Lévesque from Rue Mackay intersection, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Engigstciak image styled as 1980s Windham Hill album cover.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Engigstciak image styled as 1980s Windham Hill album cover.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 19:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vos aides et commentaires[edit]

Merci pour les commentaires que vous avez mis concernant les photos que j'ai soumis pour le label Quality images. Elle me permettent de comprendre et de progresser. --H₂O^(talk) 14:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Alpine House, Kew Gardens, 2018 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpine House, Kew Gardens, 2018 edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holiday Inn Downtown Montreal and Tour des Canadiens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fynbos, Lion's Head and trees from Table Mountain trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 21:20, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! YUL Condos from Rue Guy intersection, Montreal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sensor[edit]

I noticed the comments on QIC and I think your sensor does need some work, Daniel. 10:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View up slopes of Table Mountain to summit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the dust spots and check the veticals. --Ermell 08:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Daniel Case 07:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

Merry Christmas Daniel! ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 02:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!

Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- XRay ^talk 06:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Daniel Case! *

Joyeux Noël et tous mes vœux de bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Christmas time and all the best for 2019, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Joyeux Noël et bonne année!

Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr!

Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!

Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!

Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!

... :)

-- Poc o² 13:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)[edit]

			* Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, Daniel Case! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) Ermell (talk) 16:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View to Lion's Head from slopes of Table Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your QI candidates just withdrawn[edit]

Hi Daniel,

just read that you withdrew your images from Cape Town on the QI candidates page. If you have raw files, I think there is a good chance to make QI images from them. The dust problem on the sensor might be a bit annoying. But in the sky it can be fixed easily. If I can help you with finding good raw processing parameters, just provide an example raw image. (Is there any space to exchange temporary files just for QI-related discussion?)

Best regards, --JRff (talk) 21:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Johannes Robalotoff: I'm actually working on this right now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will make the same offer to U, if you overhand an DNG-file, I will check it out from my side. A new development is still the view from foreign eyes, but I really not understand what happened in your ACR (digital darkroom). I believe some settings are overdosed... The keywords for the main technical issues are "bevels", "edge enhancement", "edge sharpening", german words "Kantenbruch" or "Kantenumsetzung" hope we will find the correct parameter to fix it. I need DNG for keep it objective (new version 11.1 since End of last year) DNG included data from your equipment (lens AND sensor, ok dust too ;-). I have a wishlist
1) Lion's_Head_from_Signal_Hill_in_winter_morning_light
2) Lion's Head from the slopes of Table Mountain
- I will not make a pledge if I have time this week, but I will do it. Only issue is transfer-space, maybee Google-Drive. I overhand psd-files with different layers (will be big size). I don´t know a better way to show different ways of PS-Work around. Ohren hoch, ist noch kein Meister vom Himmel gefallenǃ ;-) RE-gards&Saludos, Hans-Jürgen --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: My raw files are .NEF (Nikon's format) Can you work with those? Daniel Case (talk) 07:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Daniel Case: ː Daniel, I AM NIKON, too and I know your sensor. Sometimes it´s better to convert it with your own machine, to get additional exif from lens. I can work with NEF but feel free to check out DNG (digital negative) from adobe. It´s free and real basis. Sorry for writing the wiki-articel about ACR only in german, have to translate it one day. See "https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Camera_Raw" embedded articles from adobe are english, see "http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/products/photoshop/pdfs/understanding_digitalrawcapture.pdf" the download you will find at the wiki-page, too (Version 11.1) I updated the urls today... Regards, --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:47, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: I could export them as .DNGs if you'd like. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yuup, besser ist dasǃ Do it pls--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Es könnte etwas schwieriger sein, als ich dachte. Actually, I just checked and discovered that option isn't available (My guess is that there are some proprietary features in the .NEF format (Nikon, as you probably know, has that Capture software that it markets with some features exclusive to it; I guess that's what it is) that couldn't be stripped out without seriously damaging the file.

But let me see about downloading and using this. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep calm, old Dudeǃ Listen some old rock (for example Atomic Rooster, [Made in England], Time take my Life) or [Vivaldi, Stooges, just what u need] and don´t get stressed. A NEF is the origin ("Mutter") file format. DNG is open source and free minded (which vary from one raw converter to another) it is generating a doublette, doesn´t make only one change in your origin RAW-file. Btw I like Nikon, but I hate the creepy software. Capture is a mass (bullshit). For example WLAN is still a battery-war and they don´t fixed GPS with professional bodys. With the tablet solution it´s easy to fix geodata. My gps-mouse have costs about more then 300€ and it´s shity slow and NOT exact (grrrr)... get your own experienceǃ Saludos, Hans-Jürgen

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Alright, I have converted about seven of the raw files that I used to .DNGs. Would you like me to put them somewhere in the cloud where you can get them? I have some options available to me, but if you would prefer some space of your own choice, let me know where.

By the way I took my camera to a shop to have the sensor cleaned. They were only able to blow out the dust, however, as some of the marks are from metal shards and they did not feel comfortable wiping them off because they could scratch the sensor. At least they didn't charge for what they could do.

As for the shards, they said to ask Nikon, so I'm waiting for an email back from them.

This might mean it's time to start using, at least for a while, the D800 I took these pictures with (Yes, it's newer but you know, you get used to the camera you've been using for a few years and you don't just give up on it ). Daniel Case (talk) 06:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Daniel Case: Hello Daniel, it´s up to you. The two Lion-Head I will work out you can send by mail (see my commons page for adress). I will upload the psd-files at my google drive for sharing. You can start with your space to. Never mindǃ--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First Lion´s Head you can download here (psd-file) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gST1ri7xJVqsf-Sl3c4PeYZfXplZb0jd I only do not understand why Dxo can´t read exif from your jpeg and DNG?? Need NEF, too. Sorry for bother. I documented ACR Settings in additional word, like a recipe. The Hipa-Layer shows a way of sharpening, it´s not a must, more a add. screw like a gearwheel. Nice weekend - --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: I looked at it briefly. I will be away at a convention for the weekend, so I won't be able to send you the .NEF until Sunday. Daniel Case (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiDay[edit]

Saw you listed under "regrets" for WikiDay tomorrow. Thought I'd let you know, then, that at least your work will be there. :) As last year, I've compiled some stand-out images of NY by NY Commons photographers and included these: cascade, cairn, tracks, Speedway, and pond. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rhododendrites: Well, that was nice ... I did miss the event, and I hope that next year WikiDay and LaxCon don't overlap. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Automated categorization[edit]

Hi, Daniel. I’m contacting you because you described yourself as "a very active Commons categorizer". I’ve been doing a lot of categorizing of images in Category:Images from Cleveland Museum of Art and I can’t help but feel that almost everything I’m doing could be more efficiently and systematically done in an automated or at least semi-automated fashion. For all I know what I’m asking about is already possible (or because of some technical limitation is not possible), but I’m just not tuned-in enough to know, so forgive me if what I’m about ask seems clueless.

So, take as an example File:Alexandre Lunois - Interior of a Peasant's House, Valley of Bethmale, France - 1941.500 - Cleveland Museum of Art.jpg in Category:Lithographs in the Cleveland Museum of Art. What I envision is that a bot or a gadget could read the Artist field in the Artwork template and add the file to Category:Lithographs by Alexandre Lunois in the Cleveland Museum of Art, creating the category if doesn’t exist, and then remove the file from the supercategory. Ideally it would also add the file to Category:Lithographs by Alexandre Lunois, creating that category if it doesn’t exist, making it a subcategory of Category:Works by Alexandre Lunois or just Category:Alexandre Lunois—whatever the user specifies.

I mean, it would be even more ideal if that file were uncategorized and a tool could combine information from all the fields like Artist, Medium, Collection and Place of creation to could create/add additional categories like Category:Lithographs from France in the Cleveland Museum of Art, Category:19th-century lithographs in the Cleveland Museum of Art and the intersection category Category:19th-century lithographs from France in the Cleveland Museum of Art and add them to the appropriate supercategories.

Is this possible now and I just don’t know about it? Or is there some reason it’s not feasible? —Rrburke (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Broccoli[edit]

Hi, Daniel Merci pour ton vote. Tu ne t'ai pas trompé c'est un broccoli... Qui est un chou! Bonne journée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

!vote and !votes in FPC[edit]

Hi Daniel, I'm wondering what the !vote and !votes you are writing in your FPC comments are doing, I wasn't able to find documentation about this notation here on Commons. Regards – Lucas 07:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lucasbosch: Some people, myself included, use the exclamation point before "vote" on-wiki to acknowledge that sheer numbers are not the way we decide things (otherwise it would be too easy for people to just drive loopholes right through policy, even if inadvertently), that our expressions of favor or disfavor for something must also include, even if by reference, our reasons why or why not, since it is really about consensus rather than majority. See here for another statement about this. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Signatures inside the template[edit]

Hi Daniel, I think it is better to have your signature inside the template. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks Daniel for adding Category:Photographs taken on .... at some of my files. Regards --Olga Ernst (talk) 09:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Daniel Case,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Daniel Case,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Categorization is based (IMO) on anything significant in (or about) the picture, not just what the photographer wanted the subject to be[edit]

You undoed again and wrote in the edit summary: "Categorization is based (IMO) on anything significant in (or about) the picture, not just what the photographer wanted the subject to be." I think...on the contrary, we should not blindly add to files so that avoid adding too many unnecessary categories. We have to make sure that every category added to the file is useful. When I said "useful", I meant that they will choose File:台灣夏末的雲DSC 7026.jpg or File:View of Miaoli on Freeway 1.jpg as the subject of the composition(a white cloud), since the picture itself is sufficiently eye-catching.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Daniel Case,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP-vote[edit]

Sorry but I don't really understand your reason here, I don't see a issue. First: The images is available under a free license here, and now on Flickr also. Second: the photo was never under a non-free license (all rights reserved is just a default choice if you forget to choice a license), even if I uploaded the photo on web page without any information the photo will still be "all rights reserved" since photos are protected by copyright. I have uploaded 1000s of photos under free licenses and I think it is a bit ridiculous to talk about a "right issue" here.--ArildV (talk) 18:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ArildV: I didn't realized you had changed the license at Flickr ... it used to be so much harder. I have therefore changed my !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Regards--ArildV (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP candidate - map of NY[edit]

Hi Daniel Case! You opposed on the NY map as FP Candidate with the argument that the map is not correct. Thank you for the comment. I corrected the I-86. Do you see any other issue? Thanks (I am not pushing to change your vote :-) but as you have not reacted I just try to understand if there is something else that can improve the map) regards --Ikonact (talk) 08:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you very much![edit]

… for the many valuable categories you have added to my two photos! I try to categorize my photos well, but often I do not know all possible categories or forget some of them, so your help is very much appreciated! --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Aristeas: You're welcome! Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

identity?[edit]

Hi Daniel - could I ask if you're sure that File:3500-foot sign on West Kill Mountain, Spruceton, NY.jpg shows Betula papyrifera? I'm thinking it looks more like Betula alleghaniensis, though not 100% sure. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS, could you archive the older parts of your talk page, please: it is very long, which can cause some computers to crash when opened for viewing. Thanks! MPF (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2020![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2020, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bronze statue of Mao Zedong at National Museum of China.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bronze statue of Mao Zedong at National Museum of China.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

File:Statue and paintings of Mao Zedong at 120th anniversary exhibit, National Museum of China.jpg

Yours sincerely, 沈澄心 ✉ 12:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bronze statue of Mao Zedong at National Museum of China.jpg[edit]

File:Bronze statue of Mao Zedong at National Museum of China.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mardi Gras Flashing - Color (identity protected).jpg[edit]

You uploaded File:Mardi Gras Flashing - Color (identity protected).jpg, a modified version of File:Mardi Gras Flashing - Color.jpg, and described the modifications as:

face blurred to protect flasher's identity; her face is not what's encyclopedic here

I made some minor changes to this description, then cut it down to just “Face blurred”. As I noted in the second edit’s summary:

Commons is not Wikipedia. Commons files are used on non-encyclopedic projects too.

If you object to this change, please add a topic on the image’s talk page; I am watching it. Brianjd (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Dappled_light_and_shadow_by_country[edit]

Dappled light and shadow by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sipperly-Lown Farmhouse, Rhinebeck, NY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cape Verde[edit]

Sorry, but I had to reverse this edition you did. Cape Verde is an independent country since 1975 and should not be included into Portugal categories.

Pierre cb (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Pierre cb: Alright, thanks ... I should have looked that up first. Daniel Case (talk) 14:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- Johann Jaritz ^talk 15:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

Hello Daniel,

thank you very much for all your pictures and contributions on Commons!
I wish you and your loved ones a Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy 2021.

All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy New year 2021[edit]

* Happy New year 2021" Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Goshen Central High School.jpg[edit]

File:Goshen Central High School.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2603:8081:160A:BE2A:8C5F:91D5:C41F:8E82 09:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Checking...[edit]

Hi! Did you e-mail me tonight or has your e-mail account been hacked? I only want to make sure it's you before I answer. Cheers, --Cart (talk) 21:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tracks are for Trains - What prompted the template?[edit]

As In the title, what prompted the template?

I think it's a good thing to do, I assume you are also aware of "Operation Lifesaver" in the US?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: What prompted it was seeing an awful amount of pictures taken by people from on tracks. At around the same time, OLI was beginning a campaign to warn people against doing that for their social media feeds. I thought it was a good idea here, too, and we copied the wording of that campaign. Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will also mention that there has been some concern in the UK rail enthusiast press about 'vidiots' ( i.e people taking video on phones, photographers and so on being in unsafe positions.). This included a minority at enthusiast events, that should have known better. Do you plan on encouraging wider use of the message on other sites? My thought would be to try and get the 'Trainsim' community aware as well. In the early 2000's I encouraged a community of train-sim developers to put the message 'There's nothing Virtual about Serious injury! Real Trains Kill!' in banner ads on their sites along with appropriate commentary, but the original site that was the hub page of that campaign is no longer online sadly.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Individual_men_with_microphones[edit]

Individual men with microphones has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Senator2029 20:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yet another barnstar for you[edit]

Another Reviewer Barnstar

For your outstanding reviews on the FPC page. I have learned a lot from your comments on photographs, whether you praise or point out problems. Your hints on the composition, on the colours etc. hit the nail on the head and often make clear in a few words what I have somehow sensed but have not seen clearly. Your contributions therefore contribute a great deal to making the FPC page not (just) a competition for featured images, but a great place to learn. --Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS, to avoid misunderstandings: This is not (only) a ‘thank you’ for your last ‘support’ vote on one of my photos. Your comment has just reminded me that I have been wanting to thank you for a long time for all of your FPC comments, including any critical ones, so I finally did it ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:NJT locomotive 4109 in CNJRR heritage livery at Port Jervis, NY.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:NJT locomotive 4109 in CNJRR heritage livery at Port Jervis, NY.jpg

Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NJT locomotive 4109 in CNJRR heritage livery at Port Jervis, NY.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not addressed stitching issue in FP candidate[edit]

Hello Daniel, I hope you are doing well. I fixed the note you added in an FPC of mine some time ago. I couldn't take care of that earlier because I was retired. Thank you for that, there was indeed an issue there. Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Tracks are for trains[edit]

Template:Tracks are for trains has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 20:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos of minors in open-crotch pants[edit]

You took the following photos:

These photos do not have {{Consent}} or {{Personality rights}} templates. Did you obtain consent? Brianjd (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Brianjd: Thanks for the reminder—at the time I uploaded them we had barely started putting those tags on images. I put {{Consent}} tags on them with the "public" argument since they were both taken in public spaces. Since they're from behind and you can't see the subjects' faces, I didn't think {{Personality rights}} was necessary. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Water conservation billboard on Breakwater Boulevard, Cape Town.jpg[edit]

File:Water conservation billboard on Breakwater Boulevard, Cape Town.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

116.206.28.42 12:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy Holidays![edit]

✴ Happy Holidays, Daniel ✴

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года!

--Aristeas (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your support[edit]

Thank you. For your support of my FPC Fishermen at work. Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Stained wooden clapboard siding.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stained wooden clapboard siding.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categorization[edit]

@Daniel Case: You did an excellent job at categorizing File:Public Square Watertown NY 2022.jpg in March, so, if possible, could you also categorize the images in Category:2022 in Watertown, New York and its subcategory? Thanks. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 18:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wilhelm - Costume design for Arac, Gunon, and Scynthius (Princess Ida, 1884).jpg[edit]

Sorry, forgot to ping you here. Responded. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FPX[edit]

IMHO the FPX brick is not meant to give the final kick to an already unsuccessful nomination. It’s the nominator’s choice to withdraw it any time. FPX is meant for freshly nominated images showing issues which cannot be tolerated on FPC – such as too small / unsharp / tilted / pixelpulp – to spare them an exhausting series of opposes. The image in question is not that bad at all, and wasn’t a clearly losing candidate from the beginning IMHO. "does not fall into our guidelines because it does not look likely to succeed" is a weird reason. --Kreuz schnabel 15:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Village Dump[edit]

Just some information for you: My edit on w:wp:Village dump was an accident and I didn’t intend for vandalism, I just thought it would be a cool page, and had no knowledge of it being used by trolls, could you please unblock me? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What's your enwiki account? When I search for one by this name there, it tells me that no account by that name exists. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Daniel Case: IP: 2603:7080:da3c:7a33::/64. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 19:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, I looked at that range. Yes, I have blocked it for a rather long time. But there are other problematic edits from the IP besides the ones to "Village Dump" which make the case for an unblock a little more complicated.

You have edited Commons and other Foundation wikis productively under this username. How come you've never created an account at enwiki? I realize now that the block may be preventing that, but you've had the opportunity for a while. I mean, if you wanted to do that, it might be easier that way. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well I only started really editing on other wikis after I was blocked (other than one time years ago I uploaded a photo). – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Daniel Case: Could you please respond? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, I'm going to be a little busy at real-world work through the end of the month but I can at least start here.

Is that one edit to the "Village Dump" page the only one you made from that range? There are other edits that led to the block. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As far as I know of every edit under that range was made by me, but at the time I didn't really understand the system, now I am much more experienced. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also the reason I kept creating pages with new requests and questions is because of two reasons:

1) Since I was blocked from editing pages other than my Talk Page every time my IP changed I would have to create a new page.

2) At the time I didn't really understand why I was blocked, and wasn't really given a full explanation. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, next time you respond, can you please ping me? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: Sure (I actually thought this new system does it automatically, so I haven't done it as much) Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, can you reply to my other answers? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: I read them; I understand. I am thinking of talking to the admin who made the original block to see what he thinks. I would answer at some length but it's getting late by US Eastern time and I have to get up early for work tomorrow and I want to get some other things done before bed). Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just so you know: I also live in upstate New York. Also, could you talk to him? (there are some edits I have been waiting a long time to make) – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: Sure; probably not till tomorrow (i.e., much later today) though. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. Also, if a blocked user has a dynamic IP, what are they meant to do about their Talk Page? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: That's why it's easier in those situations to have an account. I wish we could create talk pages for ranges, but they'd be treated as regular user account talk pages and thus the blocked IPs could not use them.

Since we've been more willing to block /64 ranges of late, since ISPs give them out more with the idea that a single user will be assigned them, that is an issue we should address (but it's beyond my pay grade, unfortunately). Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, maybe you could submit a phab request? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: Yeah, or just suggest the idea on ... Village Pump!

Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On which wiki? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: Enwiki, since that's where we are having the issue so far. Discussions there IME seem to get more people interested in doing something to change it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, how am I meant to start a discussion if I am blocked? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I meant that I would do it ... as an admin who has blocked a lot of people, I'd like to think my opinion would carry some weight. But of course if you can join in you should, and I won't be starting that discussion just yet.

(I'm sorry I wasn't able to respond yesterday ... my workday was longer than expected, I didn't get much sleep beforehand and then of course the weather was unseasonably cool. I finally got home, ate a belated dinner, watched TV with my wife and then I just couldn't stay awake any more (especially since I had to get up earlier again. And then tomorrow I have to get up even earlier

Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay. Also, have you asked El C yet? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: Yes. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you so much!

– Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

El C responded to your question saying that he’s okay with whatever you want to do, so am I getting unblocked? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ilovemydoodle: I just did it. You can create your account there now. Happy editing! Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC) (Addendum ... sorry it took a while, I had to work around work. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Thank you!

– Ilovemydoodle (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Userpage[edit]

Shouldn’t it say "Barnstars" instead of "Barnstar"? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, it probably should. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 04:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia typo[edit]

Could you please change "Doom, first online first-person shooter" to "Doom, the first online first-person shooter" on this page? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blocked, again[edit]

I am now blocked again from Wikipedia, and I don't know why. Could you please help sort this out? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Pines, Pine Plains, NY 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Pines, Pine Plains, NY 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The picture was taken by LaShonda Osborne[edit]

Please give credit where credit due 69.206.44.221 22:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@69.206.44.221: I was there that day; I still very much remember taking that image with the camera credited in the metadata. I do not remember anyone else being there, save my son sitting in my nearby parked car. It isn't perfect; I wish the sun had not been where it was, but it depicts the lake and that's what counts.

I do not not understand why you insist you took that image ... it has always existed in purely digital form (I don't have the original memory card anymore; there was no print original). Perhaps you took one that seems very similar? I assure you then it is a coincidence. I'd be interested in seeing it.

I note that your IP resolves to the Kingston area ... perhaps you can email me via the link on my user page? This is not the best way to discuss this. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Milan skyline around Unicredit Tower from Duomo.jpg[edit]

File:Milan skyline around Unicredit Tower from Duomo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This file is an image of a structure with a copyright-protected design, captured in a jurisdiction without the "Commons:Freedom_of_panorama freedom of panorama," and the uploader did not supply a license from the architect.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : MxRox.

And also:

File:Milan skyline with Unicredit Tower and Bosco Verticale.jpg ( Nominator : MxRox | Reason : This file is an image of a structure with a copyright-protected design, captured in a jurisdiction without the "Commons:Freedom_of_panorama freedom of panorama," and the uploader did not supply a license from the architect. )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Daniel Case! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023, Daniel![edit]

* Happy Holidays 2022/2023! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:26, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy Holidays 2022/2023![edit]

✴ Happy Holidays, Daniel Case ✴

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

--Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

Happy holidays, Daniel Case!

Hello Daniel Case, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It has been a pleasure to have you as a fellow Wikimedian this year. Wherever you are, enjoy the festive season and stay warm (if you're north of the Tropic of Cancer)! Your help in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikimedia Commons will always be appreciated.

Greetings from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
--SHB2000 on 12:18, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categorization of File:Fossil-Mammutbaum-Miozän-Naturmuseum-Dortmund.jpg[edit]

Hi Daniel! Thanks for your edits on File:Fossil-Mammutbaum-Miozän-Naturmuseum-Dortmund.jpg. I have made the description more precise: the original location of the fossil was Oregon, USA. The petrified wood is currently exposed in a museum in Germany (where also my photo was taken). Question: I thought that Category:Petrified wood in the United States refers to the orginal location of the fossil and not to the place where the fossil in currently expsosed. Thus I think Category:Petrified wood in the United States is still correct. What do you think? --Tuxyso (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe it should be "petrified wood from the United States". "In", to me, in English, means "physically within" in that sense, at the time the photo was taken.

A lot of our art-location categories would benefit from this, as we have many photos of artworks from one country exhibited in another. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame[edit]

I believe Vali Vijelie entry is incorrect and should be removed.

Thanks. 107.122.161.25 20:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you telling me? Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Window and door on weathered garage wall.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Window and door on weathered garage wall.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[1][edit]

Think ye might have made a typo there. While I do try for 50% women-related restorations, this isn't one of them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you[edit]

		The Category Barnstar
		At a FPC (my picture Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney (AU), Darling Harbour -- 2019 -- 3193-5.jpg) I saw your comment: “And I really admire the categorization … I didn't find anything to add to it! Great!”. This has created a certain smirk and honors me. Thank you for all the categories I learned about through you. XRay 💬 04:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for coming to the 2023 NYBG Edit-a-thon![edit]

Hello Daniel_Case! Thank you for coming to the July 29: New York Botanical Garden Environment of the Bronx Wikipedia Edit-a-thon and for your great work on the Wikipedia:Hutchinson River article.

Wil540 art (talk) 16:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]