Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hacker-Pschorr Oktoberfest Girl.jpg

File:Hacker-Pschorr Oktoberfest Girl.jpg, featured Edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2015 at 14:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Info Oktoberfest girl delivering beer. Created by Markburger83 - uploaded by Przemek Jahr - nominated by --Mile (talk) 14:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • One more portrait, to compare with that belllow of Swedish journalist. Yann, Colin, welcome to judge and comment. I dont know if its made by professional.
  •   Support -- Mile (talk) 14:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment The composition and the smile are very nice. It looks overexposed though. Can this be corrected? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment I did check with some -EV. Not much to gain. But on the other hand, i like simbioze of ligth colors (white, blonde, blue) so i dont mind some +EV. I would not like to spoil some, maybe author wouldnt like it. --Mile (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Oppose for now; too much overexposure in her hair, clothes and at the beer foam (background is not so important, but it is overexposed as well). --Kadellar (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Oppose per Kadellar --Kreuzschnabel 06:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Oppose Blown highlight per Kadellar. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment Mile if it helps: Remix -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 15:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support Very good picture. The slight overexposure reflects the summer atmosphere at Oktoberfest quite well. It is therefore in this case an artistic element and no reason to decline FP status. On the contrary, this is what makes the picture special. --Code (talk) 08:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alternative Edit

 

  •   Support this version. Yann (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Comment Much better but the background looks overprocessed (sharpened noise or artifacts). --Kreuzschnabel 07:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Compared to the original, yes I agree, but inevitable the EV decrease is very high and I did not manipulate the affected areas, would stay artificial, inconsistent. This was the best compromise between the colors and brightness, in my manipulations (and taste). -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 13:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Please Yann; Kreuzschnabel, New version: I tried to recover the contrast of the original noise texture, only in the background, and smoothing the cuts, can evaluate whether it was better? Otherwise I revert to the previous, ty -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 17:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support I think it’s well acceptable now. Thanks for your efforts! --Kreuzschnabel 18:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support Good also. --Mile (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support st. -- Linksfuss (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support. --Brateevsky {talk} 19:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Lukewarm support It's a compromise I know, and the composition is great, but I still think we can do better. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Yes for sure, but within my limitations believe that from this point on I could not get good results, I am afraid to ruin the color composition. ; ) -- Lauro Sirgadocontribs 13:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 17:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People